![]() ![]() They had to change formats anyway as US states started to demand use of open formats. So they did two things that are related to decrease compatibility: They created new bogus open formats and changed the interface. Still MS realized that Libre Office and OO were getting too close and were a potential threat as they were able to improve compatibility. Resellers prefer expensive products for their margins. IT heads often buy products that give them lots of work (employment) and big budgets. Their interests are not to sell and buy cheap and easy to maintain products. Professionals that sell and buy the products are not the users or the payers for the products. MS hold over its customers is because of lock-ins and the fact that resellers and IT-heads prefer expensive products rather than cheap ones. A monopolist can squeeze more out of their customers if their hold over them is stronger (they can not run away). Which means if I double the price and thereby triple my margin, but I lose half of my customers, I still make more profit. A monopolist will base price not on market competition but price elasticity. Why does MS do these irrational things from a user perspective? Because as a monopolist MS can maximize profits by pricing. For users and companies, any program that does not comply to the CUA-standard has a long learning curve and is costly. You can do all common tasks in the same way as they use the same icons and things are placed in the same menu's. New users do not have to relearn the whole interface when using a new program. Which simply means: things work and look the same throughout all programs. Windows became popular because MS made developers use the same libraries and supporting the same Common User Interface. With little used functions, you will spent an inordinate amount of time. I can scan all the menu's in seconds, while it takes me minutes to scan all the ribbons trying to figure out what the icons mean. * second: Our mind is trained to scan text, not icons. You have to completely relearn the interface, and with less used functions that takes years. * first: it lacks logic, it is very hard to reason where stuff is situated. Take the Ribbon, that MS evangelists herald as a feature not a bug. While ODF is an open standard, some software applications do not support it, which can make file sharing and collaboration more difficult.Why Libre Office is a very good alternative to MS Office, but it should look further. LibreOffice, on the other hand, uses the OpenDocument Format (ODF) by default. This makes it easier to collaborate with others who use Microsoft Office. Microsoft Office is the industry standard, which means that its file formats are widely supported by other software applications. However, if you need more advanced features or are working with large datasets, Microsoft Office might be a better option.Ĭompatibility and integration are essential factors in choosing an office productivity suite. It offers a range of features, including text formatting, graphics editing, and basic spreadsheet functions. LibreOffice is an excellent choice for those who need basic office productivity software. However, Microsoft Office has some advanced features, such as data analysis tools in Excel and a more intuitive user interface. Both suites allow you to create documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. When it comes to features and functionality, both LibreOffice and Microsoft Office have a lot to offer. You can purchase it online or in retail stores. ![]() Additionally, Microsoft Office is more readily available. While Microsoft Office is often more expensive than LibreOffice, it offers features that are not available in the open-source software. This makes LibreOffice an excellent choice for those who want a cost-effective alternative to Microsoft Office. It is an open-source software, which means that the source code is available to the public, and developers can modify and redistribute it. One significant advantage of LibreOffice is that it is free to download and use. The suite includes software such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook. ![]() Microsoft Office, on the other hand, is a proprietary software suite that is available in both subscription-based and one-time purchase models. It includes applications such as Writer (a word processor), Calc (a spreadsheet program), Impress (a presentation tool), and Draw (a graphic design application). LibreOffice is an open source, free to use productivity suite that offers similar functionality to Microsoft Office. But which one is better: LibreOffice or Microsoft Office? Both offer a range of applications that can help you create documents, presentations, spreadsheets, and more. When it comes to office productivity suites, LibreOffice and Microsoft Office are two of the most widely used software packages in the world today.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |